North central Florida voters have supported state senator and former house representative Jason Brodeur based as on his campaign promises to limit government bureaucracy. For more than a decade, the rising star in Florida politics developed a reputation as one of the most conservative members of Florida’s legislature which is why one of his latest bills came as a major surprise and drew national attention from conservatives including Newt Gingrich.
Brodeur’s bill, SB 1316, would require a written record of whether a blogger is being paid to write an online post about the governor, another Florida Cabinet official, or a state legislator, as well as who pays them. Bloggers would be fined $25 a day, up to $2,500, if they fail to provide the information.
The bill immediately sparked controversy, landing at the top of the Drudge Report. Political pundits across the state and the nation immediately responded with criticism for what they deemed as an oppressive, big brother stance against free speech. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich tweeted, “The idea that bloggers criticizing a politician should register with the government is insane. It is an embarrassment that it is a Republican state legislator in Florida who introduced a bill to that effect. He should withdraw it immediately.”
Florida political talk show host Ed Dean shared his commentary on Brodeur’s bill via a Facebook post that read: “A new Florida proposal would make bloggers who write about Gov. DeSantis, the AG or any other members of the Florida executive cabinet or legislature MUST register with the state or face fines. And this didn’t come from a Democrat but from a GOP State Senator Jason Brodeur. What happen, you got some bad publicity or something? Totally against free speech and Unconstitutional. Wokeism from my side of the aisle.”
Brodeur defended his bill on Twitter, writing: “Do you want to know the truth about the so-called “blogger” bill? It brings the current pay-to-play scheme to light and gives voters clarity as to who is influencing their elected officials, just like how we treat lobbyists. It’s an electioneering issue, not a free speech issue”
Florida First Amendment Foundation, whose executive director Bobby Block compared the bill to similar laws in “apartheid South Africa, the countries behind the Iron Curtain, the USSR, Zaire, Burkina Faso, and socialist Ethiopia.”
In 2014 Russia’s President Vladimir Putin implemented a policy known as the “blogger’s law” which required bloggers with more than 3,000 readers to register with the Roskomnadzor, the country’s agency for media oversight. No word has come from Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis yet on if he would sign the bill if it passed through the Florida House and Florida Senate.
Three Reasons Why Trump’s 2024 CPAC Poll Victory is Meaningless – Opinion
For the average observer of American politics, it’s easy to interpret recent straw polls conducted by CPAC as an indication of overwhelming party-wide support for Donald Trump to be the Republican Nominee for President in 2024. There are two key reasons why it’s foolish to take any straw poll seriously, but especially the most recent polls pitting Trump vs a handful of other candidates.
REASON 1: Trump’s total number of Republican opponents, if any, won’t be anything close to the tally of the 2016 field.
Trump faced 16 Republican opponents in 2016, including multiple long-established major names in the party who received millions from major donors. The large field fractured the opposition, allowing Trump to win primaries with mere pluralities through the vast majority of the primary campaign season. In 2024, the largest number of Republican rivals Trump will face should be less than three, and even more likely, only one candidate, due to fear of voter backlash. Should he face only one opponent, that brings someone such as DeSantis from a 25 to 30 point deficit to a tie, virtual tie, or lead.
REASON 2: CPAC is composed of the most staunch political activists on the right wing of the party, not average Republican voters.
Trends, opinions and preferences of the majority of members of CPAC and other political organizations comprised of party activists inherently clash with the sentiment of average American voters. For example, in 2011, Herman Cain won a string of straw polls, including “Presidency 5” , a conference held in Orlando that was hosted by the American Conservative Union, the same organization which hosts C-PAC.
In that straw poll, Texas Governor Rick Perry finished in second place, and ultimate 2012 nominee Mitt Romney finished in third place, fairing only 3.1% higher than Senator Rick Santorum. For those of you who don’t recall, Cain didn’t even make it to 2012 as a candidate, and Perry officially left the race less than two weeks after the start of 2012.
The reason for Cain and Perry’s success in Presidency 5? Attendees wanted to show their staunch opposition to the establishment favor, Mitt Romney. Trump can no longer expect an anti-establishment favorite pick to work in his favorite, because whether Trump likes it or not, he IS the party establishment at this point.
REASON 3: Multiple Trump opponents didn’t attend CPAC
Due to allegations of sexual misconduct by CPAC’s chairman Matt Schlapp, multiple Republicans opted out of the event this year, including Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, former Vice President Mike Pence, South Carolina’s Sen. Tim Scott, and Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin.