Home Blog Page 6

Florida Democrats Urge Reversal of $2.5 Billion Federal Public Health Funding Cut

WASHINGTON, D.C. — A group of Florida House Democrats is urging President Donald Trump and Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Cheryl Kennedy to reverse the sudden termination of nearly $2.5 billion in federal public health grants to the state of Florida.

In a joint letter sent this week, Representatives Lois Frankel (FL-22), Debbie Wasserman Schultz (FL-25), Kathy Castor (FL-14), Frederica Wilson (FL-24), Darren Soto (FL-09), Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (FL-20), Maxwell Frost (FL-10), and Jared Moskowitz (FL-23) expressed deep concern over what they described as a “dangerous and disruptive” funding cut. The lawmakers warned that this rollback threatens critical health services not only in Florida but across the country.

“These grants support vital public health initiatives, including childhood immunizations, infectious disease control, mental health programs, and HIV prevention and treatment,” the representatives wrote. “Public health should never be a casualty of political ideology.”

The letter criticized the decision as politically motivated and detrimental to years of bipartisan efforts in health research and community care. The cuts are reportedly part of a broader nationwide reduction in public health funding initiated by the administration.

The lawmakers called on the administration to conduct an immediate review and restore the terminated grants, asserting that communities throughout Florida depend on these resources for life-saving treatment and preventive care.

“Our communities are counting on you to help them provide life-saving research, treatment, and care,” the letter concluded.

The full letter is available [here].

Poll Shows Most North Carolina Voters Say Tariffs Raise Prices, Doubt Job Benefits

RALEIGH — A majority of likely voters in North Carolina believe tariffs will raise consumer prices, with many skeptical about their potential for long-term job creation, according to a Carolina Journal Poll.

The survey of 614 likely voters found that 75% think tariffs increase product prices, while 52.5% believe higher tariffs on imports could create more U.S. manufacturing jobs. Despite some support for tariffs, 40.6% do not see economic benefits from them, though 33.9% are willing to wait one to three years for potential results. Additionally, 49% agree that tariffs would likely harm businesses and raise prices, while 41% see them as necessary for protecting domestic manufacturing. Only 10% preferred tariffs as a method to boost manufacturing jobs, compared to 26.3% who favored a non-interventionist approach and 24.5% who supported cutting regulations.

Donald Bryson, CEO of the John Locke Foundation, noted that the results reflect North Carolinians’ awareness of tariffs’ trade-offs and emphasized the need for pro-growth reforms.

More than half of voters (53.5%) believe the economy is deteriorating, and 68.3% report witnessing labor shortages in businesses.

Political Favorability Ratings:

  • Gov. Josh Stein: 48.1% favorable
  • Former Gov. Roy Cooper: 47.5% favorable
  • Sen. Thom Tillis: 26.4% favorable
  • Former President Donald Trump: 45.5% favorable

Social Issues:

  • Sunday Hunting: 43.7% support lifting restrictions.
  • Definition of “Woman”: 63.6% support defining a woman as assigned female at birth.
  • Raw Milk Sales: 58.5% support allowing dairy farmers to sell raw milk directly to consumers.

Housing Solutions:

  • 34.3% support increased funding for affordable housing.
  • 20.6% believe decisions should remain local.

Other Issues:

  • 62.9% favor limiting flag displays in state buildings.
  • 84.7% oppose minimum grade policies in education.
  • 28.9% support legalized sports betting.

The Carolina Journal Poll captures public opinion on key economic, political, and cultural issues as the state approaches an election cycle.

Dispute Erupts Following North Carolina Rep. Chuck Edwards’ Speech

ASHEVILLE, N.C. — U.S. Rep. Chuck Edwards (R-N.C.) and a local Rotary official are offering conflicting accounts of a confrontation that occurred Saturday night during a Rotary District 7670 conference in downtown Asheville.

According to Edwards, he was the target of an intoxicated individual’s belligerence following his scheduled speech at the event. However, a Rotarian who helped organize the conference, Guy Gooder, says Edwards appeared to be the aggressor in an altercation that followed remarks some attendees found controversial.

Gooder, a graphic designer from Franklin and a sponsor of the event, said he did not directly witness the alleged physical contact but heard Edwards strike a seated attendee with a clipboard as he exited the conference room. Gooder stated that Edwards’ body blocked his view at the time of the incident. He added that the two men then left the room while continuing their exchange.

As of Monday, Edwards’ office had not returned a phone call seeking comment. Edwards did release a statement Sunday, following inquiries from McClatchy and confirmation from the Asheville Police Department that officers responded to a disturbance at the Embassy Suites by Hilton, the site of the conference.

In his statement, Edwards said, “I refused to engage with an intoxicated man that was cursing. He became more belligerent and later called the police. His behavior was embarrassing to the people at the event and was duly noted by the police.”

The Asheville Police Department confirmed that no arrests were made and no injuries were reported. A full police report has not yet been released. McClatchy has requested both the 911 call and the finalized report.

Gooder, who serves on the Franklin Tourism Development Authority board and is registered as an unaffiliated voter, disputes Edwards’ characterization of the other man involved. He said the individual was not belligerent and that such behavior would be quickly addressed in a Rotary setting, where members are expected to set aside political differences.

The disagreement stemmed in part from Edwards’ speech, which Gooder said diverged from the nonpartisan tone expected at Rotary events. While the congressman had been invited to speak about recovery efforts following Hurricane Helene—similar to remarks the night before by Buncombe County Commission Chair Amanda Edwards—Gooder said Edwards used much of his address to defend former President Donald Trump’s policies, including federal agency budget cuts and tariffs.

Gooder said Edwards’ comments were critical of agencies like the State Department and the World Health Organization, both of which Rotary partners with on global health initiatives such as polio eradication. He described the speech as insulting to the intelligence and mission of many in the room.

According to Gooder, the confrontation occurred as Edwards walked down the center aisle after his speech. A seated attendee allegedly criticized Edwards’ remarks, prompting the congressman to stop and respond. That exchange escalated, with Gooder stating that Edwards then struck the man with a clipboard.

The man allegedly involved in the altercation declined to comment when contacted by McClatchy, citing an ongoing conversation with a police detective and efforts to reach a resolution.

Following the incident, police vehicles were visible outside the venue, and organizers addressed the situation onstage, offering apologies to attendees. Gooder, while critical of the decision to invite Edwards, said he appreciated the acknowledgment.

As of late Monday, no further information had been provided by the Asheville Police Department or Edwards’ staff. The Rotary District has not released an official statement regarding the incident.

Josh Hawley Goes Against Republican Colleagues, Urges Senate to Not Cut Medicaid

Senator Josh Hawley (R-Missouri) criticized the Republican Party’s proposal to cut Medicaid spending by $880 billion over the next decade in a New York Times op-ed. Hawley called the cuts “morally wrong and politically suicidal,” warning they would harm lower-income Americans and contradict the party’s promises.

The legislation, introduced by House Republicans, seeks to impose work requirements and restrictions on Medicaid beneficiaries. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that around 8.6 million people could lose their health coverage due to these changes. Hawley noted that Medicaid serves over 70 million Americans, including more than a million in Missouri, and that the cuts could lead to hospital closures and increased premiums.

Hawley’s position reflects a rift within the Republican Party, as some members are concerned about the impact of these cuts on constituents. Despite the backlash, the House Energy and Commerce Committee is proceeding with the legislation, targeting a completion date by Memorial Day.

This situation highlights the difficulty Republicans face in balancing financial goals with the needs of their voters, particularly in states with expanded Medicaid. The proposed cuts continue to generate controversy within the party and among the public.

Missouri May Make Gold and Silver Legal Tender

Missouri may soon allow gold and silver to be used as legal tender, thanks to new legislation passed by state lawmakers.

Key Features of the Legislation:

  1. Legal Tender Status: Gold and silver coins and bullion will be accepted for payments on debts and taxes within the state.
  2. No Capital Gains Tax: The bill removes state capital gains taxes on the sale of precious metals to promote their use in commerce.
  3. Federal Protection: State agencies cannot collaborate with federal authorities to confiscate gold or silver from Missouri residents.
  4. Electronic Transactions: The legislation permits electronic systems to handle transactions involving precious metals.

If signed by Missouri Governor Mike Kehoe, Missouri will join five other states in recognizing gold and silver as legal tender. This shift may provide a hedge against inflation and decrease reliance on the Federal Reserve. However, critics question the practicality of using these metals in daily transactions due to their potential value volatility.

Additionally, the Missouri Department of Revenue will set rules for accepting gold and silver payments, streamlining this transition. As of now, the governor’s decision is awaited, marking an important moment in the ongoing debate over monetary policy and alternative currencies in the U.S.

Thom Tillis Will Note Vote for Trump’s Pick for Federal Prosecutor in DC

Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC) has publicly opposed President Donald Trump’s nomination of Ed Martin as U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, citing concerns over Martin’s ties to the January 6 Capitol riot and his conduct during his interim tenure. Martin, a conservative activist and former Missouri GOP chair, has been serving as the interim U.S. Attorney since January 2025.

Martin’s interim appointment has been marked by controversy. He has dismissed or demoted prosecutors involved in Capitol riot cases, launched a “Make D.C. Safe Again” initiative, and expressed support for individuals charged in the January 6 attack. Additionally, Martin has faced criticism for omitting numerous media appearances from his Senate disclosures and for making inflammatory comments about fellow Republicans and Capitol Police officers.

Senator Tillis, a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, emphasized his stance that all individuals who unlawfully entered the Capitol should be prosecuted. He expressed skepticism following a meeting with Martin, criticizing his past support for riot participants and his rhetoric surrounding the event. Tillis’s opposition is significant, as it could effectively block Martin’s nomination from moving forward in the committee.

The Senate Judiciary Committee has not scheduled a vote on Martin’s nomination, and with his interim appointment set to expire on May 20, 2025, uncertainty surrounds his future in the role. If the Senate does not confirm a successor in time, the federal court in D.C. may appoint an interim U.S. Attorney to replace him.

Martin’s nomination has also faced opposition from Senate Democrats and over 100 former prosecutors, who have raised concerns about his qualifications and impartiality. Despite support from some Republicans, including Senator John Cornyn, Martin’s confirmation remains in jeopardy due to the growing bipartisan scrutiny.

North Carolina House Approves Bill Limiting DEI Programs in Government

The North Carolina House of Representatives approved a bill that would restrict diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in state and local government agencies. The legislation, House Bill 171, passed in a 68-45 vote, largely along party lines.

The bill, sponsored by House Majority Leader Brenden Jones, would prohibit government entities, including state agencies and schools, from using DEI considerations in hiring or providing benefits based on characteristics such as race, sex, ethnicity, and sexual orientation. It would also bar the use of state funds for DEI programs and prevent agencies from applying for federal grants that require adherence to DEI-related policies.

“This is about restoring focus on merit and qualifications,” Jones said during the floor debate. “We’ve seen government institutions move toward what I would call ‘agenda hiring.’” He added that the bill would not affect academic curricula or cultural observances such as Black History Month or Pride Month.

The version of the bill passed Wednesday is narrower than earlier drafts. A previous version would have extended restrictions to non-governmental entities and imposed criminal penalties. The current version applies only to government bodies and includes potential civil fines of up to $10,000 per violation.

Democratic lawmakers strongly opposed the measure, arguing it could undermine programs designed to support historically marginalized communities. House Democratic Leader Robert Reives defended the value of DEI efforts, saying, “There are many individuals who some may label as ‘DEI hires’ who are highly qualified. This legislation sends a harmful message.”

Rep. Amos Quick, a Democrat from Guilford County, also questioned the bill’s intent. “The first line of the bill says it’s eliminating diversity initiatives,” he said. “You can’t claim to value diversity while seeking to eliminate initiatives that promote it.”

Wednesday’s vote followed delays earlier this month, when Democratic legislators gathered in the House gallery in protest. House Speaker Destin Hall said the delays were due to a sponsor’s excused absence, not the protests.

Efforts to curtail DEI programs have become a priority for Republican lawmakers in North Carolina and across the country, with similar proposals introduced in multiple states. The North Carolina Senate has already passed two separate bills addressing DEI in K-12 schools and public universities.

However, even if HB 171 advances through the Senate, its fate remains uncertain. Governor Josh Stein, a Democrat, is expected to veto the measure. Republicans hold a veto-proof majority in the Senate but are one seat short of that threshold in the House, meaning at least one Democratic vote or an absence would be needed to override a veto.

Poll Indicates Tight Race in Potential Senate Battle of Kemp vs. Ossoff

Recent results from a poll conducted by the Atlanta Journal-Constitution revealed a potential barnburner in a showdown between Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp and Sen. Jon Ossoff in a hypothetical 2026 Senate race. In a head-to-head matchup, Kemp and Ossoff are deadlocked within the poll’s margin of error of 3.1 percentage points, with Kemp at 49% and Ossoff at 46%.

Kemp, who hasn’t made a public decision on entering the race, enjoys a 60% approval rating among Georgia voters. Kemp is also the only Republican in the AJC poll who led against Ossoff. Other Republicans, including conservative firebrand Marjorie Taylor Greene, trailed Ossoff by wide margins over double digits. Ossoff took 54% vs. Green’s 37%. Georgia Sec. of State Brad Raffensperger fared slightly better than Green, earning 39%. The least recognized name, John King, got 38%. King is Georgia’s Insurance and Safety Fire Commissioner.

“Kemp’s approval rating is bolstered by strong support from independents and even a third of Democrats,” the AJC noted. “That puts him nearly 20 points ahead of President Donald Trump and reinforces recent AJC polls showing the Republican is one of the most well-liked figures in Georgia politics…It’s unclear whether Trump’s plummeting approval numbers will rub off on Kemp, who has supported the president’s priorities. The AJC poll shows many parts of that agenda — including tariffs and his immigration policies — are opposed by the majority of Georgians.”