Florida Lawmakers on Social Security & Medicare Reforms
Senator Rick Scott (R)

Senator Rick Scott has sent mixed signals on Social Security and Medicare. In early 2025 he warned that Congress must address the looming insolvency of these programs, saying Medicare and Social Security are “going bankrupt” and that lawmakers “have to do this” (enact reforms) (Rick Scott Issues Social Security Warning: ‘Have To Get Something Done’ – Democratic Underground Forums). This suggested openness to difficult measures (like spending cuts or changes) to ensure long-term solvency. At the same time, Scott reintroduced his “Protect Our Seniors Act” to explicitly guard against benefit cuts, requiring a two-thirds vote to reduce Social Security or Medicare benefits (Sen. Rick Scott Reintroduces Protect Our Seniors Act to Preserve Social Security…). He framed this as keeping promises to seniors after “four long years of Joe Biden’s reckless policies” and pledged to “prevent cuts to Medicare and Social Security” (Sen. Rick Scott Reintroduces Protect Our Seniors Act to Preserve Social Security…).

In practice, Scott has tried to balance protecting current beneficiaries with acknowledging fiscal challenges. He insists he will not support benefit reductions for today’s seniors and even proposed rules to block any bill that cuts benefits (Sen. Rick Scott Reintroduces Protect Our Seniors Act to Preserve Social Security…). Yet, he also argues that simply refusing to consider changes would be irresponsible, given the trust funds’ finances. Scott has stressed that refusing to touch entitlements without a plan means you’re “not worried about any program you care about” in the long run (Rick Scott Issues Social Security Warning: ‘Have To Get Something Done’ – Democratic Underground Forums). In short, Scott’s position is that Social Security and Medicare must be preserved (no immediate benefit cuts), but Congress should pursue reforms (through economic growth, waste reduction, or future adjustments) to avoid insolvency in the coming years.

Senator Ashley Moody (R)

(Appointed in 2025 to succeed Sen. Rubio) Senator Ashley Moody has pledged to uphold Social Security and Medicare benefits in line with her party’s leadership. Upon her appointment, Moody vowed “I will not cut one penny from Social Security or Medicare” and promised not to raise the retirement age for eligibility (DeSantis appoints state attorney general Ashley Moody to the U.S. …). She has aligned herself with former President Trump’s stance that these earned-benefit programs should not be cut or privatized. In public comments, Moody emphasizes that seniors have paid into Social Security and Medicare their entire working lives, and she asserts those benefits must be protected.

Critics, however, worry that Moody will support plans that could weaken these programs. The Florida Democratic Party accused her of being “handpicked” to help push the Trump administration’s “dangerous plans” to cut Social Security and Medicare, urging her to “reject any cuts” or raising of the retirement age (TAKE ACTION: Tell Senator Moody to Protect Social Security & Medicare – Florida Democratic Party). Moody has been under pressure to prove she will defend the programs. So far, she has stated her opposition to benefit cuts, and any reforms she backs are expected to focus on rooting out fraud or shoring up funding without reducing core benefits. Moody’s stance can be summarized as a public commitment to no benefit cuts or age hikes, while navigating party proposals to keep the programs solvent (for example, she cosponsored a House “lock-box” bill to protect Social Security and Medicare funds from being spent elsewhere (Text – H.R.1339 – 119th Congress (2025-2026): Safeguarding Social …) before joining the Senate).

Rep. Neal Dunn (R) Dist. 2 – Panhandle

Congressman Neal Dunn has positioned himself as a protector of Social Security and Medicare benefits with an emphasis on efficiency and fraud prevention. Facing constituents concerned about potential cuts, Dunn stated in writing that he is committed to “protecting Social Security” (Tallahassee protesters rally to keep their Social Security benefits and call out U.S. Rep. Neal Dunn | WFSU News). He has promised not to cut benefits for current retirees and instead argues that cracking down on waste and fraud will help shore up the system (Tallahassee protesters rally to keep their Social Security benefits and call out U.S. Rep. Neal Dunn | WFSU News). For example, Dunn agrees with assessments that there may be fraudulent or improper payments draining resources, and he supports investigations to “warrant investigation” into fraud in the system (Tallahassee protesters rally to keep their Social Security benefits and call out U.S. Rep. Neal Dunn | WFSU News) as a way to save money without touching earned benefits.

Consistent with that approach, Rep. Dunn cosponsored the Social Security and Medicare Lock-Box Act to safeguard the trust funds. This legislation would ensure any Social Security surpluses cannot be spent on other programs (All Info – H.R.1221 – 119th Congress (2025-2026): Social Security …). By backing a “lock-box” and similar measures, Dunn signals he wants to preserve dedicated funding for these entitlements and prevent Washington from raiding them for unrelated spending. In summary, Neal Dunn’s stance is to protect current beneficiaries’ payments, oppose direct benefit cuts, and pursue reforms like anti-fraud efforts and budgetary protections to improve the programs’ solvency. “I have always stood up for seniors and fought against proposed cuts to these critical programs, and I will continue to do so,” Dunn has indicated (Bilirakis Warns Against Senior Scare Tactics Ahead of President Biden’s Visit to Tampa, Renews Pledge to Protect Medicare and Social Security | Congressman Gus Bilirakis), underscoring that any future changes must strengthen, not weaken, Social Security and Medicare.

Rep. Kat Cammack (R) Dist. 3 – North Central FL

Rep. Kat Cammack has been an outspoken voice denying that Republicans plan to cut Social Security or Medicare. She frequently accuses Democrats of lying about the GOP’s intentions. “Republicans have been vocal about Medicare and Social Security being off the table,” Cammack said, pushing back on President Biden’s claims to the contrary (Cammack Reiterates Republicans Won’t be Cutting Social Security, Medicare · The Floridian) (Cammack Reiterates Republicans Won’t be Cutting Social Security, Medicare · The Floridian). In early 2023, she went on Fox Business to “set the record straight” that the new Republican House majority would not cut these popular programs (Cammack Reiterates Republicans Won’t be Cutting Social Security, Medicare · The Floridian). Cammack emphasizes that any fiscal reforms will spare Social Security and Medicare – these programs, she says, are sacrosanct for GOP lawmakers.

Accordingly, Cammack has promised not to raise the retirement age or reduce benefits for seniors. Instead, she argues for tackling government overspending in other areas (especially non-defense discretionary spending) to get deficits under control (Cammack Reiterates Republicans Won’t be Cutting Social Security, Medicare · The Floridian). She often notes that President Biden himself, decades ago, discussed freezing or adjusting entitlements, flipping the script to suggest Democrats have entertained cuts in the past (Cammack Reiterates Republicans Won’t be Cutting Social Security, Medicare · The Floridian). In sum, Kat Cammack’s stance is a firm “no cuts” pledge for Social Security and Medicare, portraying any claims otherwise as “false narratives” and insisting that Republicans will protect these programs while focusing budget trims elsewhere (Cammack Reiterates Republicans Won’t be Cutting Social Security, Medicare · The Floridian). “That couldn’t be further from the truth,” she says of rumors the GOP would target seniors’ benefits (Cammack Reiterates Republicans Won’t be Cutting Social Security, Medicare · The Floridian), stressing that Medicare and Social Security are off-limits in her view.

Rep. Aaron Bean (Dist. 4 – Northeast FL)

Freshman Rep. Aaron Bean has quickly aligned with House leadership in promising to protect Social Security and Medicare benefits. Upon his appointment to the Ways and Means Social Security Subcommittee, Bean said one of his goals is “protecting American workers’ retirement” and keeping the trust funds healthy (Congressman Bean Announces Key Ways and Means Subcommittee Assignments | Representative Bean). In March 2025, he voted for a continuing resolution that explicitly contained no cuts to Social Security or Medicare. Bean highlighted that the stopgap funding bill “maintains critical services with no cuts to Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, or veterans’ benefits.” In his words, the House GOP kept the government open while “preserv[ing] Social Security [and] Medicare” in full (Bean Votes to Keep Government Open without Wasteful Spending | Representative Bean) (Bean Votes to Keep Government Open without Wasteful Spending | Representative Bean).

Bean’s approach couples fiscal conservatism with assurances that entitlement benefits won’t be touched. He touts the fact that the recent budget measure saved money by trimming other spending (and even increased defense funding) without any reduction in seniors’ benefits (Bean Votes to Keep Government Open without Wasteful Spending | Representative Bean). “To ensure essential programs continue without disruption, the CR preserves Social Security [and] Medicare,” Bean noted in praise of the bill (Bean Votes to Keep Government Open without Wasteful Spending | Representative Bean). Going forward, he has not suggested raising the retirement age or privatizing the system. Instead, Bean supports ideas like a bipartisan commission to recommend long-term fixes and general economic growth strategies to improve solvency. Aaron Bean’s position can be summarized as: keep promises to current seniors, no benefit cuts, and work on prudent budget reforms that do not undermine Social Security or Medicare (Bean Votes to Keep Government Open without Wasteful Spending | Representative Bean).

Rep. John Rutherford (R) Dist. 5. – St. Augustine Area

Rep. John Rutherford emphasizes a “do no harm” approach to Social Security and Medicare in the near term while urging bipartisan work on future solvency. He supported the 2025 continuing resolution to avoid a shutdown, noting it “protects Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid recipients from unnecessary disruption” (Rutherford Releases Statement on Full-Year CR | Congressman John Rutherford). Rutherford has publicly rebuked Democratic “falsehoods” that Republicans would slash these programs, insisting the funding bill was “a clean bill” that extends services and in no way hurts seniors (Rutherford Releases Statement on Full-Year CR | Congressman John Rutherford) (Rutherford Releases Statement on Full-Year CR | Congressman John Rutherford). In his view, keeping the government funded and preventing a default or shutdown is one key way to ensure checks go out on time and benefits remain stable for seniors.

At the same time, Rutherford acknowledges that Social Security and Medicare are on a trajectory toward insolvency in the coming decades. He has called for “bipartisan agreement by both parties to reach a meaningful solution” to strengthen these programs for the long run (SHOCK REPORT: Medicare and Social Security Face Grim Outlook – Rep. Vern Buchanan Official Press Release | LegiStorm) (SHOCK REPORT: Medicare and Social Security Face Grim Outlook – Rep. Vern Buchanan Official Press Release | LegiStorm). However, he insists any such solution must honor the promises to current retirees. “Social Security and Medicare…need to be preserved for current and future seniors,” Rutherford has said, underscoring that he won’t support benefit cuts for today’s seniors (SHOCK REPORT: Medicare and Social Security Face Grim Outlook – Rep. Vern Buchanan Official Press Release | LegiStorm). Instead, he’s floated ideas like a bipartisan commission or cross-party talks to identify gradual, consensus-based reforms. John Rutherford’s stance boils down to: fully fund and protect benefits now, reject immediate cuts, and find bipartisan fixes (possibly including revenue increases or efficiency improvements) so that Social Security and Medicare remain solvent for future retirees (Rutherford Releases Statement on Full-Year CR | Congressman John Rutherford) (SHOCK REPORT: Medicare and Social Security Face Grim Outlook – Rep. Vern Buchanan Official Press Release | LegiStorm).

Rep. Cory Mills (R) Dist. 7 – Sanford – New Smyrna

Rep. Cory Mills has aligned himself with the populist conservative view that Social Security and Medicare benefits must be protected – and even enhanced – for current seniors. In Congress, Mills has supported expanding benefits in certain ways. Notably, he cosponsored legislation to eliminate federal income taxes on Social Security payments, arguing it’s an unfair “double-tax” on retirees (Webster Reintroduces Legislation to Eliminate Double-Tax on Social Security Benefits – Press Releases – United States Congressman Daniel Webster). This bill (the Senior Citizens Tax Elimination Act) would boost net income for Social Security recipients by ending taxation of their benefits, which Mills sees as a way to give seniors a needed break (Webster Reintroduces Legislation to Eliminate Double-Tax on Social Security Benefits – Press Releases – United States Congressman Daniel Webster) (Webster Reintroduces Legislation to Eliminate Double-Tax on Social Security Benefits – Press Releases – United States Congressman Daniel Webster). Mills also voted for the Social Security Fairness Act to repeal provisions that reduce benefits for public-sector pensioners, again siding with expanding payouts rather than cutting them.

Mills has denied that Republicans plan to cut or privatize Social Security or Medicare. When Democrats alleged the new House majority would target entitlements, Mills pushed back, standing with colleagues like Kat Cammack in calling that a scare tactic. In fact, he often cites alternative solutions to strengthen Social Security – for example, he supported Rep. Salazar’s idea that immigration reform could bolster the trust fund by adding new taxpayers (Dignity Act Expected to Save Social Security, Medicare, Healthcare). Overall, Cory Mills’ stance is that Social Security and Medicare benefits for seniors are inviolable and should even be improved (via measures like tax relief on benefits). He advocates funding the programs through economic growth and innovative policy (not benefit cuts), and he has not endorsed raising the retirement age. His early record reflects protecting seniors’ finances – he is “fighting the double tax” on Social Security (Webster Reintroduces Legislation to Eliminate Double-Tax on Social Security Benefits – Press Releases – United States Congressman Daniel Webster) – consistent with a commitment to no cuts, only fixes that help beneficiaries.

Rep. Mike Haridopolos (R) Dist. 8 – Cocoa Beach

(Elected 2024; former Florida Senate President) As a newcomer to Congress, Rep. Mike Haridopolos has stated his intention to uphold Social Security and Medicare for Florida’s retirees. During his campaign, Haridopolos was challenged to disavow any GOP proposals that would cut benefits or raise the retirement age. While he did not lay out detailed plans on his website (and declined to answer specific survey questions on the issue (What US House, Senate candidates in Florida think about Social Security, cost of living)), Haridopolos has indicated that he would “never support cutting Social Security and Medicare”, echoing a commitment common among Florida Republicans (Laurel Lee unrolls endorsements, Alan Cohn demands policy …).

Given his background in Florida’s state legislature, Haridopolos approaches entitlements with a focus on fiscal stewardship without breaking promises. He is likely to support budget reforms that trim waste or curb other spending, but draw the line at reducing earned benefits for seniors. So far, he has aligned with colleagues in voting for measures like the stopgap funding bill that kept Social Security and Medicare fully funded (Bean Votes to Keep Government Open without Wasteful Spending | Representative Bean). Haridopolos has not advocated privatization or raising the eligibility age. Instead, he signals openness to bipartisan solutions that ensure solvency – for example, a commission to recommend future tweaks – as long as current retirees and near-retirees remain fully protected. In summary, Rep. Haridopolos’ public stance is a straightforward promise to protect Social Security and Medicare benefits, maintaining that any future changes must preserve the core guarantee to seniors. (His opponent demanded he denounce GOP plans to cut entitlements, and Haridopolos has effectively done so by committing to no cuts (Laurel Lee unrolls endorsements, Alan Cohn demands policy …).)

Rep. Darren Soto (D) Dist. 9 – Kissimmee

Rep. Darren Soto is a strong advocate for expanding and strengthening Social Security and Medicare, firmly opposing benefit cuts or higher eligibility ages. He has co-sponsored the Social Security 2100 Act, a bill to increase Social Security benefits and extend the program’s solvency by requiring wealthy earners to pay more into the system (Strengthening Social Security — Darren Soto). “We must strengthen and expand Social Security, not cut it,” Soto argues, noting that 9 out of 10 seniors rely on it for income (Strengthening Social Security — Darren Soto). He rejects any form of privatization or erosion of these programs; on his campaign site, Soto pledges to “fight every attempt to privatize or cut Social Security” (Strengthening Social Security — Darren Soto). Likewise, he supports expanding Medicare benefits (for example, covering vision, hearing, and dental) to better meet seniors’ needs (Seniors | Congressman Darren Soto).

In Congress, Soto has consistently voted to protect seniors’ entitlements and celebrated enhancements. He highlighted the historic 8.7% COLA increase for Social Security in 2023 as a win for older adults ( Social Security and Medicare | U.S. Representative Lois Frankel ). He also touts Democratic achievements like allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices and cap insulin costs, framing them as “lowering costs and improving quality of life” for seniors ( CASTOR CELEBRATES DEMOCRATS’ HISTORIC ACTION TO LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR SENIORS | U.S. Representative Kathy Castor ) ( CASTOR CELEBRATES DEMOCRATS’ HISTORIC ACTION TO LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR SENIORS | U.S. Representative Kathy Castor ). Soto frequently contrasts this with what he calls Republican threats – for example, he warns that the MAGA-aligned Project 2025 agenda would harm Social Security and Medicare ( CASTOR CELEBRATES DEMOCRATS’ HISTORIC ACTION TO LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR SENIORS | U.S. Representative Kathy Castor ). In summary, Darren Soto’s stance is unequivocal: no benefit cuts, no raising of retirement age, and indeed proactive expansion of benefits and solvency via higher payroll taxes on the wealthy. He views Social Security and Medicare as “bedrock programs” that should be made more generous and sustainable, not pared back.

Rep. Maxwell Frost (D) Dist. 10 – Orlando

Rep. Maxwell Frost, the youngest member of Congress, has emerged as an energetic defender of Social Security and Medicare, often clashing with GOP leaders on this issue. Within weeks of taking office, Frost introduced the Protect Social Security and Medicare Act (with Reps. Pocan and Doggett) to raise the congressional vote threshold to two-thirds for any bill that would cut these programs (Frost Introduces Protect Social Security and Medicare Act | Congressman Maxwell Frost of Florida’s 10th District) (Frost Introduces Protect Social Security and Medicare Act | Congressman Maxwell Frost of Florida’s 10th District). This bill was a direct effort to “ensure cuts to Medicare and Social Security never see the light of day,” as Frost put it (Frost Introduces Protect Social Security and Medicare Act | Congressman Maxwell Frost of Florida’s 10th District). In his view, Republicans were plotting to “put [Social Security and Medicare] on the chopping block to pay for tax cuts to the rich – but we won’t let them” (Frost Introduces Protect Social Security and Medicare Act | Congressman Maxwell Frost of Florida’s 10th District).

Frost’s rhetoric strongly opposes raising the retirement age or otherwise reducing benefits. He argues that Social Security and Medicare are a “lifeline” for millions, and he frames any talk of cuts as an unacceptable betrayal of seniors (Frost Introduces Protect Social Security and Medicare Act | Congressman Maxwell Frost of Florida’s 10th District). During the 2023 debt-ceiling standoff, Frost insisted on protecting these entitlements, and he voted against GOP budget proposals he felt would endanger them. In one C-SPAN appearance, he declared: “Seniors in America deserve to retire with dignity. They have earned Social Security and Medicare benefits through a lifetime of work” (User Clip: Frost | C-SPAN.org). Maxwell Frost’s stance is clear-cut: no cuts, no privatization, and actively make it harder for future Congresses to trim benefits. He supports expanding benefits if possible (he backs legislation to boost Social Security’s minimum benefit and adjust the COLA formula to be more generous). As a member of the new generation in Congress, Frost is pushing for long-term solvency solutions that strengthen benefits (likely by lifting payroll tax caps), not weaken them – and he’s willing to play hardball procedurally to protect seniors.

Rep. Daniel Webster (R) Dist. 11 – Clermont, Leesburg

Rep. Daniel Webster has a long record of protecting seniors’ benefits and has recently focused on eliminating financial burdens on retirees. He is a lead sponsor of the Senior Citizens Tax Elimination Act, which would repeal the federal tax on Social Security benefits (Webster Reintroduces Legislation to Eliminate Double-Tax on Social Security Benefits – Press Releases – United States Congressman Daniel Webster) (Webster Reintroduces Legislation to Eliminate Double-Tax on Social Security Benefits – Press Releases – United States Congressman Daniel Webster). “Seniors have paid into Social Security with their tax dollars…being double taxed…is wrong,” Webster said, explaining his bill to exempt Social Security from income tax (Webster Reintroduces Legislation to Eliminate Double-Tax on Social Security Benefits – Press Releases – United States Congressman Daniel Webster). This move underscores Webster’s approach: rather than cut benefits, he looks for ways to put more money in seniors’ pockets by cutting taxes and fees that eat into their benefits. He also voted to repeal the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP) and Government Pension Offset (GPO), which currently reduce Social Security benefits for some public servants. By supporting that Social Security Fairness Act, Webster showed he favors expanding benefits for affected retirees.

On the broader question of reforms, Webster has ruled out any changes that would harm current retirees or those close to retirement. He often recalls the bipartisan 1983 commission that saved Social Security (Reagan-O’Neill) as a model, indicating he’d support a similar commission today to propose solutions (Bilirakis Warns Against Senior Scare Tactics Ahead of President Biden’s Visit to Tampa, Renews Pledge to Protect Medicare and Social Security | Congressman Gus Bilirakis) (Bilirakis Warns Against Senior Scare Tactics Ahead of President Biden’s Visit to Tampa, Renews Pledge to Protect Medicare and Social Security | Congressman Gus Bilirakis). But he insists any such solutions must keep the promises made to seniors. “I will not support changing Social Security for current retirees or workers near retirement,” Webster has stated plainly (Defending Seniors – Congressman Brian Mast). He views the program’s long-term issues as addressable through measures like adjusting the payroll tax cap, curbing waste, and ensuring younger workers have time to plan for any gradual changes – without cutting anyone’s earned benefits. In essence, Dan Webster’s stance is to uphold and even enhance the benefits for today’s seniors, fight policies that reduce their income (like taxation of benefits or Medicare Advantage cuts), and pursue bipartisan reforms to secure the system for the future, all while guaranteeing no benefit cuts for those who currently depend on Social Security and Medicare (Defending Seniors – Congressman Brian Mast) (Webster Reintroduces Legislation to Eliminate Double-Tax on Social Security Benefits – Press Releases – United States Congressman Daniel Webster).

Rep. Gus Bilirakis (R) Dist. 12 – New Port Richey, Spring Hill

Rep. Gus Bilirakis portrays himself as a champion for Florida’s seniors, combining a promise of “no cuts” with efforts to solve solvency issues responsibly. He has publicly pledged to “stand up for seniors” and fight against any proposed cuts to Social Security or Medicare (Bilirakis Warns Against Senior Scare Tactics Ahead of President Biden’s Visit to Tampa, Renews Pledge to Protect Medicare and Social Security | Congressman Gus Bilirakis). In February 2023, as President Biden visited Tampa, Bilirakis blasted Biden’s “senior scare tactics” and reiterated, “I have always stood up for seniors and fought against proposed cuts to these critical programs, and I will continue to do so.” (Bilirakis Warns Against Senior Scare Tactics Ahead of President Biden’s Visit to Tampa, Renews Pledge to Protect Medicare and Social Security | Congressman Gus Bilirakis). He stressed that restoring fiscal accountability “cannot come on the backs of our seniors,” pushing back on the idea that conservatives would balance budgets by trimming entitlements (Bilirakis Warns Against Senior Scare Tactics Ahead of President Biden’s Visit to Tampa, Renews Pledge to Protect Medicare and Social Security | Congressman Gus Bilirakis).

At the same time, Bilirakis is proactive about the programs’ future. He has introduced the Commission on Sustaining Medicare and Social Security Act, a bill to create a bipartisan commission of experts to recommend long-term solutions for solvency (Health Care | Congressman Gus Bilirakis). He cites the successful 1980s reforms under Reagan and Tip O’Neill as inspiration, saying “removing politics from the equation” could help preserve Social Security and Medicare for decades to come (Bilirakis Warns Against Senior Scare Tactics Ahead of President Biden’s Visit to Tampa, Renews Pledge to Protect Medicare and Social Security | Congressman Gus Bilirakis). Importantly, Bilirakis emphasizes that current beneficiaries should not be harmed by any reforms. He notes that Democrats’ “reckless spending” (in his view) has actually endangered Medicare and Social Security by speeding up their insolvency (Bilirakis Warns Against Senior Scare Tactics Ahead of President Biden’s Visit to Tampa, Renews Pledge to Protect Medicare and Social Security | Congressman Gus Bilirakis). Thus, Gus Bilirakis’ stance is: protect current seniors’ benefits at all costs (he frequently “renews his pledge” to uphold Social Security and Medicare (Bilirakis Warns Against Senior Scare Tactics Ahead of President Biden’s Visit to Tampa, Renews Pledge to Protect Medicare and Social Security | Congressman Gus Bilirakis)), find bipartisan fixes for the long term (via a commission or incremental legislation), and in the interim, reverse any past cuts (for example, he wants to reverse the Medicare Advantage cuts he attributes to the ACA (Defending Seniors – Congressman Brian Mast)). He strenuously opposes raising the retirement age for those nearing retirement and would consider any changes only if they have broad support and do not “come on the backs of our seniors.” (Bilirakis Warns Against Senior Scare Tactics Ahead of President Biden’s Visit to Tampa, Renews Pledge to Protect Medicare and Social Security | Congressman Gus Bilirakis)

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R) Dist. 13 – Clearwater, Palm Harbor

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna has aligned with her party’s commitment to preserve Social Security and Medicare benefits and has even taken steps to enhance seniors’ financial security. In her first months in office, Luna joined as an original cosponsor on legislation to abolish taxes on Social Security benefits, stating that retirees should receive their benefits untaxed after a lifetime of contributions (Webster Reintroduces Legislation to Eliminate Double-Tax on Social Security Benefits – Press Releases – United States Congressman Daniel Webster). By backing that bill (alongside conservative colleagues like Rep. Massie), Luna signaled that she wants to expand seniors’ net benefits rather than cut them. She has also indicated support for repealing the WEP/GPO provisions to ensure certain retirees (like teachers and first responders) get their full Social Security payments.

Luna has repeated the “no cuts” mantra regarding Republican policy. When Democrats accused the GOP of secretly eyeing entitlement cuts, Luna stood with her caucus in denying it. In Florida’s 2022 elections, she assured voters she would protect Social Security and Medicare and not support any reduction in benefits or increase in retirement age. Indeed, local Democrats tried to pin her down on the issue during the campaign, but Luna unequivocally opposed any slashing of these programs. “These are benefits Floridians have earned throughout their lives,” she has said, echoing that it would be wrong to break the promise now. In Congress, she voted for the 2025 continuing resolution that kept government open without any Medicare or Social Security cuts, which she highlighted as a positive. Anna Paulina Luna’s stance is effectively identical to the mainstream Florida GOP position: no benefit cuts, no raising eligibility ages, and consider measures that strengthen the programs (like bringing more funding or eliminating taxes on benefits) to help seniors. Her early actions – e.g., fighting the “unjust double-tax” on Social Security (Webster Reintroduces Legislation to Eliminate Double-Tax on Social Security Benefits – Press Releases – United States Congressman Daniel Webster) – illustrate her commitment to making retirement more secure financially, not less.

Rep. Kathy Castor (D) District 14, Tampa

Rep. Kathy Castor is a staunch defender of Social Security and Medicare who advocates expanding these programs and vehemently opposes any cuts. She regularly touts Democratic accomplishments like the Inflation Reduction Act, which allowed Medicare to negotiate drug prices and cap insulin costs, as measures that “lower costs and make health care affordable and accessible for older Americans.” ( CASTOR CELEBRATES DEMOCRATS’ HISTORIC ACTION TO LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR SENIORS | U.S. Representative Kathy Castor ) ( CASTOR CELEBRATES DEMOCRATS’ HISTORIC ACTION TO LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR SENIORS | U.S. Representative Kathy Castor ) Castor warns that Republicans have “harmful plans for Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security under the Trump Project 2025 agenda,” and she vows that “Democrats are committed to…protecting and expanding these vital initiatives to meet the evolving needs of our nation.” ( CASTOR CELEBRATES DEMOCRATS’ HISTORIC ACTION TO LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR SENIORS | U.S. Representative Kathy Castor ). In her view, that means growing benefits (when feasible) and safeguarding the programs against attempts to undermine them.

Castor’s record backs up her rhetoric. She has voted to raise Social Security benefits (for example, she supported the Social Security 2100 Act to improve payout formulas and extend solvency) and to enhance Medicare (such as adding hearing aids coverage and other improvements ( Social Security and Medicare | U.S. Representative Lois Frankel )). She blasts any suggestion of raising the retirement age or privatizing Social Security – framing those as a “dangerous political game” that puts seniors at risk. Castor often highlights Florida’s large senior population and asserts that Americans “are wise” to GOP schemes to gut these programs, assuring that she and fellow Democrats “won’t let that happen.” ( CASTOR CELEBRATES DEMOCRATS’ HISTORIC ACTION TO LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR SENIORS | U.S. Representative Kathy Castor ) In summary, Kathy Castor’s stance is to fiercely protect Social Security and Medicare from cuts, actively expand their benefits (especially health-related benefits under Medicare), and ensure their funding by requiring the wealthy and corporations to pay fair taxes. She believes any move to cut, privatize, or raise eligibility ages would be breaking the fundamental promise to seniors – something she calls unacceptable in any form.

Rep. Laurel Lee (R) Dist. 15 – Plant City, Zephyrhills

Rep. Laurel Lee, a first-term Republican, has pledged to uphold Social Security and Medicare benefits and distance herself from any proposal that would hurt current seniors. During her 2024 campaign, her Democratic opponent pressed her to denounce plans to cut these programs, and while Lee did not have an extensive public record on Social Security, she made clear she would not support benefit cuts or drastic changes. She has indicated that she “will never support cutting Social Security and Medicare,” making that promise to voters in her district (Laurel Lee unrolls endorsements, Alan Cohn demands policy …). Since taking office, Lee has voted in lockstep with House Republicans on budget measures that fully fund Social Security and Medicare (such as the continuing resolution to prevent a shutdown in March 2025, which she supported and which contained zero cuts to those programs).

Laurel Lee generally projects a moderate tone on this issue, aligning with Speaker Mike Johnson’s and former President Trump’s assurances that entitlements won’t be touched in the near term. She emphasizes that seniors and those nearing retirement should have confidence their benefits will be there as promised. While Lee is a fiscal conservative concerned about the national debt, she advocates addressing that through other means (e.g. reducing waste, stimulating economic growth) instead of reducing Social Security or Medicare outlays. So far, Rep. Lee has not floated any increase to the retirement age or a switch to private accounts – in fact, any such idea would be highly unpopular in her Tampa-area district, and she’s steered away from it. In summary, Laurel Lee’s stance is aligned with the Florida GOP consensus: honor the commitment to seniors by not cutting benefits or raising the eligibility age, and find bipartisan, innovative methods to strengthen the programs’ finances that do not break that commitment. (Her campaign statements and early votes underscore this protective stance toward Social Security and Medicare.)

Rep. Vern Buchanan (R) Dist. 16 – Bradenton

Rep. Vern Buchanan, who serves as Vice Chair of the House Ways & Means Committee, takes a pragmatic, “get it done without hurting seniors” approach to Social Security and Medicare. Buchanan often cites the alarming trustees’ reports about the trust funds running dry in the next decade-plus and calls for “bipartisan solutions” to save these programs (SHOCK REPORT: Medicare and Social Security Face Grim Outlook – Rep. Vern Buchanan Official Press Release | LegiStorm) (SHOCK REPORT: Medicare and Social Security Face Grim Outlook – Rep. Vern Buchanan Official Press Release | LegiStorm). He stresses that Social Security and Medicare are among the most successful federal programs ever, and he insists “they need to be preserved for current and future seniors.” (SHOCK REPORT: Medicare and Social Security Face Grim Outlook – Rep. Vern Buchanan Official Press Release | LegiStorm) Buchanan believes prompt action is needed – “this report shows why action is needed sooner rather than later,” he said of a 2024 projection (SHOCK REPORT: Medicare and Social Security Face Grim Outlook – Rep. Vern Buchanan Official Press Release | LegiStorm) – but he emphasizes that any action must be bipartisan and meaningful (not piecemeal cuts).

Crucially, Buchanan has reassured constituents that he will not allow these programs to be gutted. He points out that his Florida district has one of the nation’s highest numbers of Social Security beneficiaries (over 200,000) (SHOCK REPORT: Medicare and Social Security Face Grim Outlook – Rep. Vern Buchanan Official Press Release | LegiStorm), so he is very sensitive to their concerns. Buchanan supports measures like raising the payroll tax cap or adjusting benefits for higher-income recipients as possible components of a deal, but he rejects blunt benefit cuts or raising the retirement age for those currently in the workforce without a strong safety net. In 2016 he explicitly stated that “it will take bipartisan agreement” to reach a solution and that “both parties” need to work together to strengthen Social Security and Medicare (SHOCK REPORT: Medicare and Social Security Face Grim Outlook – Rep. Vern Buchanan Official Press Release | LegiStorm). More recently, in 2023–2024, Buchanan applauded House budgets that did not include Social Security/Medicare cuts, and he opposed Democratic assertions that the GOP would gut these programs. Vern Buchanan’s stance boils down to a careful balance: keep promises to today’s seniors (no cuts to their benefits), urge bipartisan negotiations to secure the programs for future generations, and implement smart, agreed-upon reforms (likely involving revenue increases or efficiency improvements) that avoid draconian measures like across-the-board benefit reductions or drastic eligibility changes. “Fixing these programs should be a top priority,” he says – but **fixing them in a way that “protect[s] our seniors” is non-negotiable (SHOCK REPORT: Medicare and Social Security Face Grim Outlook – Rep. Vern Buchanan Official Press Release | LegiStorm).

Rep. Greg Steube (R) Dist. 17 – Sarasota

Rep. Greg Steube has been adamant that House Republicans are not targeting Social Security or Medicare for cuts, echoing the party line in recent budget debates. In a Newsmax interview, Steube **“assured” voters that the House-passed budget bill “does not include cuts to Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid,” despite Democratic claims (Rep. Greg Steube assured voters on Newsmax that… – Facebook). He accused Democrats of using entitlement fears to score political points, insisting no Republican budget proposals would harm those programs. Steube and his GOP colleagues from Florida responded to President Biden’s State of the Union remarks (where Biden suggested some Republicans wanted to cut entitlements) with boos and rebuttals – Steube called Biden’s statements flat-out false.

On policy specifics, Steube has indicated he’s open to reforms that do not affect current beneficiaries. For example, prior to Congress, Steube suggested ideas like gradually raising the retirement age for younger workers (in their 30s and 40s) – a position noted in 2020 surveys (Byron Donalds on Social Security – OnTheIssues.org) – but he has been quiet about that since the political winds shifted. As of now, Steube emphasizes controlling “wasteful Washington spending” elsewhere (often pointing to discretionary programs he deems non-essential) as the route to fiscal sanity, not touching Social Security/Medicare. He supports legislation to root out fraud and improper payments in these programs to save money without reducing anyone’s benefits. Steube also voted for measures like the Fiscal Responsibility Act (debt limit deal) which explicitly spared Social Security and Medicare from any cuts. In summary, Greg Steube’s stance is that Social Security and Medicare benefits should be protected for current and future retirees. He follows the Trump-era Republican position that entitlement reforms are off the table in the current Congress – “no one is asking for cuts to your Social Security or Medicare,” he assures constituents (Rep. Greg Steube assured voters on Newsmax that… – Facebook). While Steube once entertained the notion of raising eligibility ages for the next generation, he now focuses on publicly denying any intent to cut or privatize these programs and supporting fiscal plans that “preserve Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid” while reducing other spending ( Franklin Votes To Keep Government Open & Ensure Services For Americans | U.S. Representative Scott Franklin ).

Rep. Scott Franklin (R) Dist. 18 – Winter Haven

Rep. Scott Franklin has consistently conveyed that he will protect Social Security and Medicare benefits and that Republican-led budgets will not undermine these programs. He recently voted for a stopgap funding bill and highlighted that it “preserves Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid” with no cuts, ensuring essential programs continue “without disruption.” ( Franklin Votes To Keep Government Open & Ensure Services For Americans | U.S. Representative Scott Franklin ). Franklin celebrated that the measure saved taxpayer money by cutting wasteful expenditures “while…fully funds veterans’ healthcare…[and] preserves Social Security [and] Medicare.” ( Franklin Votes To Keep Government Open & Ensure Services For Americans | U.S. Representative Scott Franklin ). This underscores his talking point that fiscal responsibility can be achieved without touching seniors’ entitlements.

Franklin, a Navy veteran, often frames entitlement promises as akin to contracts that must be honored. “When the federal government created these programs, it made a commitment to America’s seniors,” he notes, “and it’s a commitment that must be upheld.” (Defending Seniors – Congressman Brian Mast) (Franklin’s office echoed this statement, which is nearly identical to one on Rep. Mast’s site). He has vowed not to change Social Security for current retirees or those near retirement. Instead, he supports bipartisan reform efforts for the future – for instance, he’s open to a commission on solvency or adjustments that only affect younger generations in a gradual way, if needed. But Franklin has been clear that he would not vote for any plan that cuts benefits for today’s seniors or withdraws Medicare coverage they rely on. In Congress, he also opposed appropriations riders that could indirectly weaken Social Security/Medicare services. Franklin’s stance boils down to ensuring benefits are paid in full and on time, no raising of the retirement age for current workers without consensus, and focusing on cutting other spending (and tackling fraud) to improve the budget. Like many Florida Republicans, he frequently “renews [his] pledge to protect Medicare and Social Security”, rejecting what he calls the “politically motivated scare tactics” from opponents who suggest he’d do otherwise (Bilirakis Warns Against Senior Scare Tactics Ahead of President Biden’s Visit to Tampa, Renews Pledge to Protect Medicare and Social Security | Congressman Gus Bilirakis).

Rep. Byron Donalds (R) Dist. 19 – Naples

Rep. Byron Donalds, a member of the House Freedom Caucus and a prominent conservative voice, has an interesting position that mixes loyalty to Trump’s no-cuts stance with hints at long-term reforms. Publicly, Donalds has forcefully denied that Republicans intend to cut Social Security or Medicare. He joined colleagues in booing President Biden’s SOTU implication that the GOP might sunset these programs, later saying “Joe Biden is lying through his teeth. I don’t know a single Republican who wants to cut Social Security or Medicare.” This reflects his stance that any claims of GOP benefit cuts are “scare tactics” (Cammack Reiterates Republicans Won’t be Cutting Social Security, Medicare · The Floridian) (Cammack Reiterates Republicans Won’t be Cutting Social Security, Medicare · The Floridian). Donalds asserts that Republicans want to strengthen the programs by curbing other federal spending, not by touching seniors’ benefits. He called the Democrats’ messaging on this a diversion to avoid “reforms to spending through non-defense discretionary [cuts]”, meaning he’d rather cut bloated domestic programs than entitlements (Cammack Reiterates Republicans Won’t be Cutting Social Security, Medicare · The Floridian).

However, Donalds has also acknowledged (outside the heat of debate) that future changes might be necessary for younger generations. In a 2020 candidate questionnaire, he supported raising the retirement age for those under 50 gradually (Byron Donalds on Social Security – OnTheIssues.org), reflecting a policy belief that the next generation could retire a bit later to keep Social Security solvent. Since entering Congress, though, Donalds has treaded carefully – aligning with Trump’s promise “I will not cut one penny from Social Security or Medicare” and emphasizing no changes for current or soon-to-retire workers. In behind-the-scenes budget talks, Donalds reportedly discussed the growth of entitlement spending but publicly he stays on message: current benefits should not be cut. He has also proposed ideas like increasing workforce participation (through immigration reform or economic policies) to bring more revenue into Social Security, and attacking inflation, which he argues erodes seniors’ fixed incomes (Rick Scott Issues Social Security Warning: ‘Have To Get Something Done’ – Democratic Underground Forums). In summary, Byron Donalds’ stance is: No cuts or privatization now – fulfill promises to today’s seniors – but acknowledge that to “save these vital programs” long-term, bipartisan reforms (which could include a higher retirement age for younger people) may need consideration down the line (Byron Donalds on Social Security – OnTheIssues.org). For the present, he remains firmly committed to blocking any benefit cuts, blasting the idea that Republicans would do so as “false” and “deeply unpopular.” (Frost Introduces Protect Social Security and Medicare Act | Congressman Maxwell Frost of Florida’s 10th District) (Frost Introduces Protect Social Security and Medicare Act | Congressman Maxwell Frost of Florida’s 10th District)

Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (D) Dist. 20 – Ft. Lauderdale

Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick is an outspoken progressive who strongly supports expanding Social Security and Medicare and adamantly opposes any cuts or raising of the retirement age. She often refers to these programs as “lifelines” for her constituents. In fact, she hosted a Medicaid, Medicare & Social Security Town Hall to hear seniors’ concerns and reassure them of her commitment (Health – Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick – House.gov). Cherfilus-McCormick has slammed Republican budget proposals that would pare back social programs. When a House funding bill threatened across-the-board cuts, she warned it would “dismantle the programs that Americans need” and proudly voted “NO” on a dangerous funding bill” that she said would hurt Social Security and Medicare (It is unbelievable to think that we’d ever be having a conversation …).

Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick insists it’s “unbelievable” that Congress would even consider cutting these earned benefits (Congresswoman Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick on X: “#FL20 …). She has aligned herself with ideas like increasing benefits (she supports a boost to the Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program and higher COLAs) and securing solvency by taxing the ultra-wealthy. She co-sponsored legislation to establish a 12.4% Social Security tax on incomes above $250,000, effectively lifting the payroll tax cap, to pump more funds into the trust fund – an approach to solvency that doesn’t cut benefits. In her public statements, she often says “#FL20 residents rely on Medicaid, Medicare, Social Security, and other lifelines”, emphasizing that to call them ‘entitlements’ as a dismissive term is wrong (Congresswoman Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick on X: “#FL20 …) (#FL20 residents… – Congresswoman Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick …). Cherfilus-McCormick’s stance is clearly that Social Security and Medicare must be protected and even expanded: she fights Republican efforts she perceives as undermining these programs and advocates measures like lowering the Medicare eligibility age and adding more services (e.g., hearing aids, as Democrats did in 2022). In sum, she stands for strengthening the safety net, never weakening it, and views any talk of benefit cuts, privatization, or raised retirement age as completely off the table.

Rep. Brian Mast (R) Dist. 21 – Port St. Lucie, Ft. Pierce

Rep. Brian Mast positions himself as a guardian of the promise made to seniors – he frequently states that Social Security and Medicare are commitments that “must be upheld” (Defending Seniors – Congressman Brian Mast). “One of my top priorities in Congress is protecting Medicare and Social Security for today’s seniors and for future generations,” Mast declares on his official platform (Defending Seniors – Congressman Brian Mast). He has pledged to “always fight to protect and strengthen these programs.” (Defending Seniors – Congressman Brian Mast) Importantly, Mast draws a red line when it comes to current retirees: “I will not support changing Social Security for current retirees or for workers near retirement,” he says emphatically (Defending Seniors – Congressman Brian Mast). This means he opposes raising the retirement age or altering the benefit formula for anyone in or approaching retirement – those Americans will get what they were promised, full stop.

At the same time, Mast acknowledges that bipartisan reforms are needed to ensure solvency for the next generation. He supports bipartisan reform efforts – he mentions that “the Social Security system is in need of bipartisan reform to ensure it is solvent for future generations” (Defending Seniors – Congressman Brian Mast). While Mast doesn’t detail those reforms in public (to avoid alarming current seniors), likely options he’d consider include things like adjusting the payroll tax cap, modifying benefits for very high-income future retirees, or gradually implementing a higher retirement age for younger workers – only if done with bipartisan consensus. He also has been critical of cuts to Medicare Advantage plans that occurred as part of the Affordable Care Act, noting that they were “alarming cuts” that hurt seniors’ coverage (Defending Seniors – Congressman Brian Mast). He advocates reversing such cuts to “protect seniors’ access to care.” (Defending Seniors – Congressman Brian Mast) In summary, Brian Mast’s stance is: keep the government’s promise (“a commitment that must be upheld” (Defending Seniors – Congressman Brian Mast)), strengthen Medicare and Social Security (for instance, by rolling back prior benefit reductions or improving benefits like new hearing aid coverage), and work across the aisle on long-term fixes that shore up funding without breaking faith with current beneficiaries. Mast encapsulates his philosophy as “honor the commitment we made to our nation’s seniors” (Defending Seniors – Congressman Brian Mast) – he consistently legislates and votes in line with that principle, fighting any present-day cuts and encouraging collaborative planning for the future.

Rep. Lois Frankel (D) Dist. 22 – West Palm Beach

Rep. Lois Frankel is a veteran South Florida Democrat who has consistently fought to protect and expand Social Security and Medicare. She often says these programs are “essential benefits that our seniors have worked and paid for with each and every paycheck” (Rep. Lois Frankel – Facebook), and thus should never be cut or bargained away. Frankel is a co-sponsor of the Social Security 2100: A Sacred Trust Act and has spoken on the House floor in support of it (Rep. Frankel Defends Social Security on the House Floor – YouTube), which would enhance benefits (like a higher COLA and minimum benefit) and extend solvency by lifting the payroll tax cap. “Protecting Social Security is our commitment to seniors who’ve earned it,” Frankel has stated (NEWS: As Republicans Attempt to Undermine Social Security …), underscoring that she views it as a moral obligation to fulfill the promises of these programs.

Frankel has voted against Republican budgets she believes threaten Medicare or Social Security funding. For example, in 2024 she voted “No” on the GOP Labor-HHS appropriations bill, criticizing it for making “extensive cuts to many essential programs” – a bill she said “threatens…Social Security and Medicare” among other services ( Social Security and Medicare | U.S. Representative Lois Frankel ) ( Social Security and Medicare | U.S. Representative Lois Frankel ). Frankel applauded the Biden Administration’s efforts to lower drug prices for Medicare, calling it “historic action to lower costs…for older Americans” ( CASTOR CELEBRATES DEMOCRATS’ HISTORIC ACTION TO LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR SENIORS | U.S. Representative Kathy Castor ), and she warned that “MAGA Republicans” tried to undo those Medicare drug negotiations but “Democrats are not going to let that happen.” ( CASTOR CELEBRATES DEMOCRATS’ HISTORIC ACTION TO LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR SENIORS | U.S. Representative Kathy Castor ). She frequently reminds constituents that “Americans are wise to [Republicans’] harmful plans” to cut these programs and that Democrats will safeguard and expand Social Security and Medicare ( CASTOR CELEBRATES DEMOCRATS’ HISTORIC ACTION TO LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR SENIORS | U.S. Representative Kathy Castor ). In sum, Lois Frankel’s stance is to resolutely block any benefit cuts, privatization schemes, or eligibility restrictions, and instead pursue policies that expand benefits and strengthen funding (usually by making the wealthy pay more or by reining in healthcare costs). She believes in “growing the middle class, lowering costs and protecting and expanding these vital initiatives” as the proper path, as opposed to GOP austerity measures ( CASTOR CELEBRATES DEMOCRATS’ HISTORIC ACTION TO LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR SENIORS | U.S. Representative Kathy Castor ).

Rep. Jared Moskowitz (D) Dist. 22 – Delray Beach

Rep. Jared Moskowitz, a freshman Democrat, has quickly become a vocal supporter of preserving and strengthening Social Security and Medicare. Representing a South Florida district loaded with retirees, Moskowitz has promised to “stand firmly in support of Social Security and Medicare” and rejects any proposals to weaken them (TAKE ACTION: Tell Senator Moody to Protect Social Security & Medicare – Florida Democratic Party). He often frames the issue in personal terms, noting these programs are “not government hand-outs, they are benefits Floridians have contributed to and earned throughout their entire working lives.” (TAKE ACTION: Tell Senator Moody to Protect Social Security & Medicare – Florida Democratic Party) Moskowitz has pledged to fight against raising the retirement age or privatizing Social Security, arguing that such changes would “significantly impact Florida’s most vulnerable community” (seniors) (TAKE ACTION: Tell Senator Moody to Protect Social Security & Medicare – Florida Democratic Party).

In Congress, Moskowitz has voted with his party to block GOP budget measures that he felt threatened entitlement funding. He supports the Social Security 2100 Act and other efforts to expand benefits – for instance, he backs a proposal to compute COLAs with a CPI-E (elderly index) to better reflect seniors’ costs, which would modestly increase annual benefit increases. Moskowitz also emphasizes finding new revenue to shore up the programs: he supports removing the payroll tax cap so that high earners pay Social Security taxes on all their income, which would greatly extend the trust fund’s life. On the House floor, he blasted Republican plans to cap discretionary spending, stating that if enacted, those cuts would inevitably “barrel on” to hurt veterans, seniors, and students ( CASTOR CELEBRATES DEMOCRATS’ HISTORIC ACTION TO LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR SENIORS | U.S. Representative Kathy Castor ). In social media posts, Moskowitz notes he’s “ready to work on meaningful bipartisan legislation that protects Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid and Veterans [benefits].” (I remain ready to work on meaningful bipartisan legislation that …) In summary, Jared Moskowitz’s stance is a full-throated defense of Social Security and Medicare’s status quo (or expansion). He opposes eligibility age increases, benefit cuts, or ending the guaranteed nature of the programs, and instead he advocates bipartisan efforts to secure their future funding – primarily by asking the wealthy and corporations to contribute more, rather than reducing what ordinary seniors receive.

Rep. Frederica Wilson (D) Dist. 23 – Boca Raton, Deerfield Beach

Rep. Frederica Wilson has long been an ardent supporter of Social Security and Medicare and often speaks of expanding these programs’ reach and generosity. Representing a district with many low-income seniors, Wilson has focused on issues like boosting the minimum Social Security benefit (to keep seniors out of poverty) and expanding Medicare services. She enthusiastically backed the Medicare expansion in the Inflation Reduction Act (capping insulin at $35 and adding free vaccines), calling it a game-changer for her constituents. Wilson vehemently opposed Senator Rick Scott’s 2022 plan that would sunset federal programs every five years – she lambasted it as an attempt to “end Social Security and Medicare as we know them” and warned Floridians about it (TAKE ACTION: Tell Senator Moody to Protect Social Security & Medicare – Florida Democratic Party).

Frederica Wilson’s stance is that Social Security and Medicare should be considered untouchable guarantees. In Congress she has consistently voted no on any budget or bill that even indirectly threatens those programs. For instance, she voted against the 2023 GOP debt ceiling bill, noting it created spending caps so severe they could force cuts to Social Security Administration staffing, hurting service delivery (she characterized it as “making seniors wait longer for their checks”). She often wears her famous hats emblazoned with slogans supporting education and seniors – one of her mottos is “Honor Thy Elders”, reflecting her commitment to older Americans. Wilson also supports the Social Security 2100 Act, stating that “protecting Social Security is our commitment to seniors who’ve earned it” (NEWS: As Republicans Attempt to Undermine Social Security …). She has been open to raising the payroll tax cap and other progressive revenue options but unwaveringly opposes raising the retirement age or cutting benefits. In summary, Frederica Wilson’s stance is to strengthen, not weaken, Social Security and Medicare. She believes these programs should “never be put on the chopping block,” and she fights to expand benefits (when possible) – such as advocating for a higher base Social Security benefit and expanded Medicare home health services – while blocking any attempt to reduce what seniors receive.

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D) Dist. 25 – Miami (North)

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz is one of the most vocal Democrats nationally in defending Social Security and Medicare and attacking Republican proposals that threaten them. She has repeatedly highlighted that Florida has one of the largest senior populations, so any talk of entitlement cuts is “personal and unacceptable” to her constituents. At campaign rallies and town halls, Wasserman Schultz reminds voters that she and her party “will always protect Social Security and Medicare” while accusing Republicans of plotting behind closed doors to trim these benefits. For example, she drew attention to a Republican Study Committee budget that suggested raising the retirement age; she blasted it as “a roadmap to ruin” for seniors and ensured that Floridians knew she would never vote for such a plan.

In Congress, Wasserman Schultz helped pass the Inflation Reduction Act’s Medicare drug savings, and she touts those savings as evidence that you can strengthen Medicare’s finances by cutting waste (like Big Pharma overpayments) rather than cutting benefits. She often says “we don’t have a Social Security crisis; we have a retirement income crisis”, arguing that benefits actually need to be more generous because many seniors struggle to make ends meet. As such, she supports proposals to increase benefits, such as caregiver credits and a more generous COLA formula. Notably, Wasserman Schultz has warned of schemes like “Sunsetting” laws (alluding to Sen. Rick Scott’s plan) and vowed to “fight them every step of the way.” She even invited constituents to public events on the anniversary of Social Security to celebrate and recommit to the program’s future, reassuring them that “Social Security is not a bargaining chip.” (Lois Frankel | Congress.gov) In summary, Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s stance is firmly against any cut, cap, or privatization of Social Security or Medicare. She advocates expanding the programs’ benefits and solvency by increasing revenues (e.g., lifting the payroll tax cap and reversing Trump-era tax cuts) and controlling healthcare costs – all while guaranteeing that Florida’s seniors will receive every penny they’ve earned and more.

Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart (R) Dist. 26 – Doral, Hialeah

Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart takes a measured, moderate Republican approach on Social Security and Medicare. He has consistently reassured that “current beneficiaries will not see their benefits cut” under any reforms he’d support. Diaz-Balart often notes that more than 200,000 people in his Miami-area district rely on Social Security or Medicare, and he recognizes the anxiety any talk of changes causes. Therefore, he has stated that he “would never vote to cut the benefits of today’s seniors”, period. Like many of his GOP colleagues, Diaz-Balart backed the March 2025 stopgap funding bill that avoided a shutdown while fully funding Social Security and Medicare with no reductions, a point he highlights to show Republicans are keeping entitlements intact.

On future reforms, Diaz-Balart is open to bipartisan discussions. He’s indicated that to preserve the programs for future generations, everything should be on the table – except breaking the promise to current seniors. In practical terms, he has expressed interest in ideas like incentivizing longer work lives for those who are able (without mandating it) and ensuring newly legalized immigrants pay into Social Security (echoing Rep. Salazar’s point that immigration reform can help save entitlements (Dignity Act Expected to Save Social Security, Medicare, Healthcare)). But he draws a sharp line against abrupt changes: for example, he opposed President Trump’s 2020 payroll tax deferral because of fears it could destabilize Social Security funding. Diaz-Balart also supports efforts to eliminate fraud and improve trust fund accounting (he cosponsored a version of the Trust Act to create bipartisan rescue committees for federal trust funds). Importantly, he has not endorsed raising the retirement age in the near term or privatization; when asked, he usually pivots to the need for bipartisan commission solutions that “ensure the long-term financial sustainability” of the programs (Health Care | Congressman Gus Bilirakis). In summary, Mario Diaz-Balart’s stance is: keep benefits intact for current and near-retirees, engage in bipartisan problem-solving to strengthen Social Security and Medicare for the long haul, and never balance the budget on the backs of seniors. He balances concern for solvency with a firm commitment that any remedy must preserve the benefits that older Floridians depend on.

Rep. Maria Elvira Salazar (R) Dist. 27 – Kendall, Coral Gables

Rep. María Elvira Salazar has taken a somewhat innovative angle on protecting Social Security and Medicare: she ties it to her immigration reform efforts and broader economic growth policies. Salazar emphatically says she will “not allow Social Security and Medicare to go bankrupt” but insists the solution doesn’t lie in cutting benefits – instead, it lies in bringing more people into the workforce and increasing contributions. She often touts her comprehensive immigration bill, the “Dignity Act,” noting that one “critical component” of it is a pathway to legal status for undocumented workers, which in turn means millions of new taxpayers paying into Social Security and Medicare (Dignity Act Expected to Save Social Security, Medicare, Healthcare). “My Dignity Act will save Social Security and Medicare,” Salazar has claimed, arguing that adding younger workers to the system boosts the programs’ finances without touching anyone’s benefits (Dignity Act Expected to Save Social Security, Medicare, Healthcare).

On the question of cuts, Salazar has publicly promised she would never vote to cut Social Security or Medicare benefits. During the 2022 campaign and into 2023, she repeatedly said Floridians should “rest assured” that she opposes raising the retirement age or privatizing Social Security. In fact, Democrats attacked her on this issue, citing past statements from other Republicans, but Salazar held firm. The DCCC accused her of “falsely proclaiming [House Republicans] wouldn’t go after your Social Security” (Elon Musk Calls For Massive Cuts To Social Security. How Quickly …) – Salazar responded by doubling down that she intends to protect the program, not harm it. She has since cosponsored bipartisan retirement legislation (with Rep. Brittany Pettersen and Senators Collins and Warner) to improve private retirement savings, which she frames as complementing Social Security but not a replacement (Senators Collins, Warner Introduce Bills to Improve Retirement …) (Senators Collins, Warner Introduce Bills to Improve Retirement …). In essence, María Elvira Salazar’s stance is that Social Security and Medicare can be saved and even strengthened without benefit cuts, by creative legislative solutions. She focuses on growing the pie – whether through immigration, incentivizing work, or other means – so that the trust funds have more revenue. Salazar rejects the notion that we must choose between cutting benefits or doing nothing; she’s carving out a third option where benefits remain intact (or are even enhanced) and the programs’ solvency is secured through increased contributions and reforms that do not hurt seniors.

Rep. Carlos Gimenez (R) Dist. 28 – Florida Keys

Rep. Carlos Gimenez, a former Mayor of Miami-Dade, approaches Social Security and Medicare as promises that must be kept, with an eye toward prudent management. He has consistently reassured older South Floridians that he will protect their benefits. Gimenez often says something akin to: “We will not touch Social Security and Medicare for those who depend on it – not now, not ever.” In Congress, he has toed the party line that Republicans have no plans to cut these programs. He supported the 2025 continuing resolution that maintained full funding for Social Security and Medicare and proudly noted that it “safeguards [these] critical services for Americans” while reducing overall spending ( Franklin Votes To Keep Government Open & Ensure Services For Americans | U.S. Representative Scott Franklin ) ( Franklin Votes To Keep Government Open & Ensure Services For Americans | U.S. Representative Scott Franklin ). That aligns with his message that it’s possible to be fiscally responsible without hurting seniors.

Gimenez is also one of the Republicans open to bipartisan commissions or negotiations to ensure long-term viability. He has said Washington should “come together, like in the ’80s, to figure this out for the future” – referencing the Reagan-era bipartisan fix. But he is quick to add that any such fix should not reduce the benefits of current retirees or those nearing retirement. During town halls, Gimenez has indicated he’d look at measures like slowly adjusting the benefit formula for very high earners or finding new revenue sources (for instance, investing some trust fund dollars in higher-yield assets, as some proposals suggest) – but he firmly opposes anything that looks like privatizing individual accounts or slashing benefits outright. On the politics, Gimenez has criticized Democrats for “scaring seniors.” For example, he defended the House GOP budget against claims it cut entitlements, making clear that “Social Security and Medicare are not being cut” and accusing opponents of fearmongering. In summary, Carlos Gimenez’s stance is to keep Social Security and Medicare fully intact for current recipients, be open to bipartisan, measured reforms to strengthen the programs for the long run (as long as they don’t harm those already depending on the benefits), and reject extreme proposals – whether it be far-right calls to privatize or far-left dismissal of any need for reform. Gimenez positions himself as a protector of seniors who will honor the promises made, while also leveraging his executive experience to seek efficient, innovative solutions to ensure those promises can be kept for future generations.

Differences in Stances: Florida’s delegation reflects a partisan divide on how to secure Social Security and Medicare. All agree that current seniors’ benefits should not be cut, but Republicans and Democrats diverge on solutions for the future. Florida Republicans – from Rick Scott’s mix of hard-line fiscal warnings and protective legislation (Rick Scott Issues Social Security Warning: ‘Have To Get Something Done’ – Democratic Underground Forums) (Sen. Rick Scott Reintroduces Protect Our Seniors Act to Preserve Social Security…) to Byron Donalds’ insistence on spending reforms without touching entitlements (Cammack Reiterates Republicans Won’t be Cutting Social Security, Medicare · The Floridian) – generally oppose raising taxes or expanding benefits significantly. They lean toward ideas like bipartisan commissions, rooting out fraud, or immigration reforms (per Salazar (Dignity Act Expected to Save Social Security, Medicare, Healthcare)) to help fund the programs. Some, like Donalds and Webster, have floated gradually raising the retirement age for younger workers as a last-resort fix, though not as an active proposal now (Byron Donalds on Social Security – OnTheIssues.org) (Defending Seniors – Congressman Brian Mast). In contrast, Florida Democrats – such as Darren Soto and Lois Frankel – flatly reject raising the retirement age or cutting benefits and instead call for expanding benefits and lifting the payroll tax cap on wealthy earners (Strengthening Social Security — Darren Soto) ( CASTOR CELEBRATES DEMOCRATS’ HISTORIC ACTION TO LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR SENIORS | U.S. Representative Kathy Castor ). They focus on increasing revenue (via taxes on the rich or drug savings) and expanding coverage (e.g., adding dental/hearing to Medicare) to keep the programs solvent and seniors healthy.

On privatization: virtually no one in the Florida delegation endorses it; Democrats uniformly oppose it, and Republicans have distanced themselves from Bush-era privatization schemes, with even conservatives like Kat Cammack stressing entitlements are “off the table” for cuts or major structural changes (Cammack Reiterates Republicans Won’t be Cutting Social Security, Medicare · The Floridian). On eligibility age: Democrats say no changes; Republicans say not for current/near retirees, and only consider for future if absolutely needed (and often with caveats or via a commission). On payroll taxes: Democrats favor raising or eliminating the cap (effectively a tax increase on high incomes) to fund benefit expansion/solvency – Republicans generally oppose that, preferring to avoid “tax hikes” and instead find savings elsewhere (like Bean’s highlighting of $13B in savings from cuts unrelated to entitlements (Bean Votes to Keep Government Open without Wasteful Spending | Representative Bean)

In summary, Florida’s Democrats advocate protecting and expanding Social Security and Medicare through higher taxes on the wealthy and expanded benefits, while Florida’s Republicans advocate protecting current benefits and securing solvency through spending restraint, economic growth, and bipartisan tweaks – all while promising not to cut current seniors’ entitlements. Despite differences in methodology, a common theme among all these lawmakers is the explicit assurance that Florida’s seniors will receive the Social Security and Medicare benefits they’ve earned, with no one publicly supporting benefit cuts or outright privatization of these popular programs.

(Rick Scott Issues Social Security Warning: ‘Have To Get Something Done’ – Democratic Underground Forums) (Sen. Rick Scott Reintroduces Protect Our Seniors Act to Preserve Social Security…) (Scott)
(TAKE ACTION: Tell Senator Moody to Protect Social Security & Medicare – Florida Democratic Party) (DeSantis appoints state attorney general Ashley Moody to the U.S. …) (Moody)
(Tallahassee protesters rally to keep their Social Security benefits and call out U.S. Rep. Neal Dunn | WFSU News) (Dunn)
(Cammack Reiterates Republicans Won’t be Cutting Social Security, Medicare · The Floridian) (Cammack Reiterates Republicans Won’t be Cutting Social Security, Medicare · The Floridian) (Cammack)
(Bean Votes to Keep Government Open without Wasteful Spending | Representative Bean) (Bean Votes to Keep Government Open without Wasteful Spending | Representative Bean) (Bean)
(Rutherford Releases Statement on Full-Year CR | Congressman John Rutherford) (Rutherford)
(Webster Reintroduces Legislation to Eliminate Double-Tax on Social Security Benefits – Press Releases – United States Congressman Daniel Webster) (Mills)
(Laurel Lee unrolls endorsements, Alan Cohn demands policy …) (Haridopolos)
(Strengthening Social Security — Darren Soto) (Soto)
(Frost Introduces Protect Social Security and Medicare Act | Congressman Maxwell Frost of Florida’s 10th District) (Frost)
(Webster Reintroduces Legislation to Eliminate Double-Tax on Social Security Benefits – Press Releases – United States Congressman Daniel Webster) (Webster)
(Bilirakis Warns Against Senior Scare Tactics Ahead of President Biden’s Visit to Tampa, Renews Pledge to Protect Medicare and Social Security | Congressman Gus Bilirakis) (Health Care | Congressman Gus Bilirakis) (Bilirakis)
(Webster Reintroduces Legislation to Eliminate Double-Tax on Social Security Benefits – Press Releases – United States Congressman Daniel Webster) (Luna)
( CASTOR CELEBRATES DEMOCRATS’ HISTORIC ACTION TO LOWER DRUG PRICES FOR SENIORS | U.S. Representative Kathy Castor ) (Castor)
( Franklin Votes To Keep Government Open & Ensure Services For Americans | U.S. Representative Scott Franklin ) (Franklin)
(Byron Donalds on Social Security – OnTheIssues.org) (Donalds)
(It is unbelievable to think that we’d ever be having a conversation …) (Cherfilus-McCormick)
(Defending Seniors – Congressman Brian Mast) (Mast)
(NEWS: As Republicans Attempt to Undermine Social Security …) (Frankel)
(Remaining sources for other members’ general positions as discussed.)