Home Blog Page 2

Florida Democrats Could Benefit From a Brutal GOP Primary for Governor

Florida Republicans may believe their gubernatorial primary is a formality. It isn’t.

At first glance, the race appears straightforward. Byron Donalds entered as the prohibitive favorite, armed with an early endorsement from Donald Trump that came even before Donalds officially declared. In today’s GOP, that kind of preemptive backing usually clears the field.

Instead, the opposite is happening.

Last week, Jay Collins joined the race, instantly giving Republican voters a well-funded, high-profile alternative. Former Florida House Speaker Paul Renner remains a factor as well. What once looked like a coronation now has the makings of a competitive—and potentially damaging—primary.

Veterans of Republican politics have seen this movie before. The dynamics increasingly resemble the 2012 GOP presidential primary, when Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum launched sustained attacks on Mitt Romney. Romney ultimately won the nomination, but not before his own party helped define him negatively for the general electorate.

That internal warfare paid dividends for Barack Obama’s re-election campaign. By the time Romney faced Obama, many independents and suburban voters had already absorbed a caricature of him as an out-of-touch corporate raider—fair or not. Even a dominant debate performance couldn’t fully undo the damage.

Florida Republicans should take that lesson seriously.

Donalds is still the likely nominee. But a drawn-out, negative primary will extract a cost. Every attack ad, every intra-party contrast, and every ideological litmus test narrows the candidate’s general-election appeal—especially among independents, who still decide close races in Florida.

It is tempting to point to Governor Ron DeSantis’s landslide re-election as evidence that Florida is now safely red. But that victory is the exception, not the rule. Outside of DeSantis’s blowout, Florida’s statewide elections over the past quarter-century have been remarkably close.

Yes, Republicans now hold a registration advantage. But registration does not equal persuasion. Independent voters remain skeptical, transactional, and highly sensitive to tone. A nominee who emerges from a bruising primary already labeled by opponents—sometimes by fellow Republicans—enters the fall campaign at a disadvantage.

If Donalds faces a competitive Democrat after months of internal attacks, and if Trump’s standing nationally is weakened heading into November, the risk becomes real. Under the right conditions, Republicans could lose the governor’s mansion for the first time in more than 25 years.

This primary is not just about who wins. It’s about how much political damage is inflicted along the way—and whether Republicans are repeating a mistake they’ve made before.

PBS Supporters in Pensacola File Lawsuit to Preserve Station’s Funding

0

The WSRE-TV Foundation filed a federal lawsuit last week seeking to block Pensacola State College from taking control of millions of dollars donated by residents of Northwest Florida and South Alabama to support WSRE’s public television programming.

The Foundation says the lawsuit is the first of its kind in the nation and aims to protect private charitable donations from being absorbed by a government entity.

For nearly 60 years, WSRE has served as a trusted public media outlet across the Gulf Coast, providing children’s educational programming, classroom resources, military-focused content, local documentaries, and life-saving information during hurricanes and emergencies.

That work, Foundation leaders say, has been made possible largely through private donations raised by the WSRE-TV Foundation—not through state or college funding.

Foundation Alleges PSC Sought Control of Private Donations

According to the federal complaint, Pensacola State College moved to sever its relationship with the Foundation and demanded control of donor-raised funds intended solely for WSRE’s public media mission.

The lawsuit alleges PSC’s president attempted to force the dissolution of the independent nonprofit and require that private donations be transferred to the college.

“People donated because they believe in WSRE’s educational and community mission,” said Amy Day, chair of the WSRE-TV Foundation board. “They did not give so their gifts could be taken and placed into a government budget.”

The Foundation says PSC also attempted to access its bank accounts and intercept donation checks mailed by members of the public.

Lawsuit Focuses on Donor Intent

Foundation officials emphasize the case centers on donor intent—a core principle of charitable giving.

Individuals, families, veterans, and businesses across Northwest Florida and South Alabama contributed funds with the understanding that their donations would support public television programming, not general college operations.

“Private generosity built WSRE,” Day said. “Those donors deserve to have their trust honored.”

The complaint also notes that when the Foundation proposed transitioning WSRE into an independent public media entity capable of continuing PBS programming and fundraising, PSC leadership rejected the proposal.

WSRE’s Longstanding Role in the Region

WSRE serves more than 1.2 million viewers and has played a central role in the region for decades, including:

  • Children’s education and early learning programs
  • Free classroom tools aligned with school curricula
  • Programming honoring military families
  • Local documentaries preserving Gulf Coast history
  • Hurricane preparedness and emergency coverage

“Whether it’s the first day of school or the days before a hurricane, WSRE has been there,” Day said.

PSC Ends PBS Affiliation

Earlier this year, Pensacola State College voted to end WSRE’s affiliation with PBS.

While the Foundation acknowledges PSC’s authority to make institutional programming decisions, it argues that the move does not give the college the right to repurpose privately donated funds.

“PSC made its decision,” Day said. “But donors made theirs too.”

What’s Next for WSRE

The WSRE-TV Foundation says it is exploring options to continue PBS programming, local storytelling, and community services independent of PSC.

“Our goal is simple,” Day said. “Keep public media in the hands of the community that built it—and protect the trust of our donors.”

Brian Kelly, Jeff Landry, and a Huge Mess in Louisiana

By Guest Contributor J.C. Bowman

Baton Rouge, LA – In a significant escalation of the ongoing legal battle, former LSU head football coach Brian Kelly has filed a lawsuit against the Louisiana State University Board of Supervisors, seeking a declaratory judgment that his termination was without cause and that he is entitled to the full buyout of approximately $54 million stipulated in his contract.

Kelly’s dismissal from LSU came on October 26, 2025, just one day after the Tigers suffered a 49-25 defeat at home to Texas A&M, which dropped the team’s record to 5-3. Over nearly four seasons, Kelly compiled an overall record of 34-14. Since his termination, Frank Wilson has stepped in as the interim head coach.

The legal dispute arises from a contentious interpretation of Kelly’s termination. On November 10, LSU representatives informed Kelly’s legal team that he was never “formally terminated,” asserting that former Athletic Director Scott Woodward lacked the authority to execute the dismissal. The university has since claimed that grounds exist to terminate Kelly for cause, which could significantly reduce or eliminate his buyout.

The lawsuit, filed in the 19th Judicial District Court for East Baton Rouge Parish, outlines that during a recent communication, LSU’s representatives indicated for the first time that they believed grounds for a cause-based termination were present. Kelly’s attorneys countered that the university’s sudden shift in narrative is an attempt to avoid fulfilling its contractual obligations.

The petition emphasizes that LSU has not previously claimed cause for Kelly’s termination, and the lawsuit seeks to confirm that LSU’s actions are a pretext to deny Kelly the full severance he is entitled to under his contract. The document highlights that if fired without cause, Kelly is entitled to 90% of his remaining base salary and supplemental compensation, projected to be paid through 2031.

Kelly’s legal counsel has also pointed out that the university had previously offered settlement amounts of $25 million and $30 million, both of which were rejected by Kelly. These offers included terms that would eliminate offset clauses, which would reduce the buyout if Kelly accepts another coaching position.

The lawsuit does not specify the grounds for the alleged cause, nor does it detail who represented LSU during the critical call. According to his contract, any termination for cause must be accompanied by written notice and an explanation within a seven-day period, a process Kelly asserts was not followed.

As this legal dispute unfolds, the implications extend beyond Kelly himself, raising concerns regarding LSU’s reputation and its ability to attract top-tier coaching talent in the future.

Kelly, 64, has remained largely silent since his termination, though he expressed gratitude to LSU fans in a recent statement. The legal proceedings are expected to be protracted, as both parties prepare to navigate the complexities of this unprecedented situation in college football.

North Carolina Republican Sen. Tillis Questions Potential Use of National Guard in Charlotte

North Carolina Senator Thom Tillis has expressed skepticism about the federal deployment of the National Guard to cities, including the possibility of sending troops to Charlotte, arguing that it may mask failures in local leadership.

During a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Sen. Tillis pressed U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi on whether dispatching the National Guard to urban areas like Portland or Chicago represents a “best practice” for public safety or whether it serves as a temporary shock measure. He asked, “Is this deployment of the National Guard a part of an emerging best practice that I just don’t get yet?”

Bondi defended the deployments, saying that the National Guard is needed to protect federal property and maintain order, though she acknowledged the arrangement isn’t ideal. She told Tillis that she did not believe Guard members would choose to be in such roles unless called upon to “keep Americans safe.”

Tillis pushed back, suggesting that turning to the Guard might be a way to bypass accountability at the state and local levels:

Tillis’ concern: that reliance on military forces could become a default response, rather than strengthening local law enforcement capabilities.

The debate unfolds amid a broader clash over the limits of federal intervention in city governance, with questions of state sovereignty, civil authority, and public safety powerfully intertwined.

SBA Pro-Life America Launches $4.5 Million Voter Outreach in Georgia Senate Race

ATLANTA — Two national anti-abortion organizations — SBA Pro-Life America and Women Speak Out PAC — announced Tuesday that they are investing $4.5 million in Georgia’s 2026 U.S. Senate contest to mount a large-scale field operation. The groups plan to reach one million voters by Election Day, using digital advertising, direct mail, and an early vote push.

The campaign will focus on Savannah, Augusta, Columbus and Chattanooga, targeting conservative voters less likely to vote in midterms, along with persuadable voters. Jillian Wooton, SBA’s Atlanta regional field director, said the effort seeks to mobilize support in what the group considers a pivotal race.

Since 2014, SBA Pro-Life America says its voter contact program has reached more than 31 million people in battleground states. In Georgia during the 2024 cycle, the group claims to have made over 171,000 home visits. The organization has been sharply critical of incumbent Democratic Sen. Jon Ossoff, citing his legislative record on abortion issues and giving him an “F” rating on its scorecard.

Ossoff, first elected in 2021, has aligned with Democratic leadership on abortion-access legislation and has opposed a “born-alive” measure to require care for infants surviving attempted abortions. His campaign did not immediately respond to the new fundraising announcement.

Women Speak Out PAC, a super PAC affiliated with SBA, said it will help amplify pro-life messaging from women voters and coordinate ground operations through the 2026 midterm cycle.


2026 Senate Outlook & Polling Context

  • The 2026 U.S. Senate election in Georgia is scheduled for November 3, 2026, with a potential runoff on December 1 if no candidate wins a majority.
  • In the Republican primary, contenders include U.S. Rep. Buddy Carter, Insurance Commissioner John King, Mike Collins, Derek Dooley, and others.
  • Former Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, despite being viewed as a possibly strong Republican challenger, has opted out of running for Senate.
  • Polling & Forecasts
  • In a widely discussed RealClearPolitics average, Sen. Ossoff is shown leading in a hypothetical matchup against Republican candidate Marjorie Taylor Greene, 51% to 37%.
  • Analysts characterize Georgia’s Senate race as competitive, with Georgia among the states to watch in 2026.
  • A recent Quantus Insights poll found substantial uncertainty and divisions among Republican primary voters over potential nominees such as Collins, Carter and Dooley.
  • Earlier polling has shown that, in a hypothetical match-up, Ossoff could face varying margins against GOP candidates. For instance, an early January poll by WPA Intelligence placed Kemp ahead of Ossoff 46% to 40% — though Kemp is not in the race — and Ossoff posted stronger margins against other contenders.
  • Strategic Implications
    Georgia is seen as a key battleground in the Senate map for 2026. Republicans enter the cycle with structural advantages in many states, but must defend or contest seats in swing states such as Georgia.The scale of the SBA/Women Speak Out investment suggests they regard Georgia’s Senate seat as a top priority.

Iryna’s Law: North Carolina Bill Would Revive Death Penalty, Toughen Bail

RALEIGH, N.C. — A sweeping crime bill that would toughen bail rules, mandate mental health evaluations, and revive North Carolina’s death penalty is now on Governor Josh Stein’s desk, awaiting his decision. The legislation, known as Iryna’s Law (House Bill 307), passed the Republican-led legislature following the stabbing death of a Ukrainian refugee in Charlotte earlier this year.

The bill is named after 23-year-old Iryna Zarutska, who was killed on a Charlotte light-rail train in August. The suspect in the case, a repeat offender with a history of mental illness, had previously been released on a written promise to appear in court. Lawmakers say her death underscored flaws in the state’s pretrial release system and inspired the push for stricter rules.

Under the proposal, magistrates and judges would be barred from granting “cashless bail” to individuals accused of violent crimes. Judicial officers would be required to weigh a defendant’s criminal history before setting conditions of release and to issue written justifications for their decisions. The bill also gives courts new authority to impose house arrest, GPS monitoring, or secured bonds. Magistrates who fail to follow these requirements could face suspension.

The legislation also adds a mental health dimension to pretrial decisions. It requires evaluations for defendants charged with violent crimes if they show signs of being a danger to themselves or others, or if they were involuntarily committed in the past three years. If the evaluation supports commitment, the court must begin proceedings. Lawmakers also ordered a broader study on how North Carolina’s justice system addresses defendants with mental illness.

One of the most contentious pieces of the bill is its attempt to restart the death penalty in North Carolina. The measure introduces a new aggravating factor for capital punishment when murders occur on public transportation, accelerates appeal timelines, and requires hearings to take place in the county of conviction. It also authorizes alternative execution methods—including electrocution, firing squad, or nitrogen gas—if lethal injection is ruled unconstitutional or unavailable. North Carolina has not carried out an execution since 2006.

Supporters argue the bill strengthens public safety and restores accountability in the justice system. Critics counter that it revives costly and inequitable capital punishment while providing no new funding for mental health services. Governor Stein, a Democrat, has not indicated whether he will sign the measure. If he approves it, the law could face immediate court challenges and reignite debate over the role of capital punishment in North Carolina.

Collins’ Epstein Files Remark Sparks Rift in Georgia GOP Senate Battle

Newly surfaced audio reveals Rep. Mike Collins (R-GA) told attendees at a Muscogee County GOP meeting that he believes former President Donald Trump is mentioned in Jeffrey Epstein–related case files — and that those records should be made public.

The recording, obtained and published by the Washington Examiner, captures Collins responding to a voter’s question about whether Trump appears in the files. “I believe he’s in there,” Collins said, while adding that Trump had previously reported Epstein to the FBI and banned him from Mar-a-Lago. “We need to release it. I have no problem releasing it,” he continued, cautioning that legal hurdles involving judges and grand jury material have slowed disclosure.

The comments have injected new tension into Georgia’s Republican Senate primary, where Collins, Rep. Buddy Carter (R-GA), and former University of Tennessee football coach Derek Dooley are all seeking Trump’s endorsement. While Collins has positioned himself as an advocate for transparency on Epstein, Carter has echoed Trump’s stance. In an interview with Savannah’s WJCL last month, Carter said, “I support the president, and I trust the president,” signaling he is in “lockstep” with Trump on the matter. Dooley has largely sidestepped the issue.

The controversy underscores broader GOP divisions over how to handle the files of the convicted sex offender, who died in federal custody in 2019. Trump has faced criticism for failing to follow through on earlier pledges to release the records. Democrats have seized on the dispute. Sen. Jon Ossoff (D-GA), up for re-election in 2026, said in a July speech: “He promised to release the Epstein files. Did anyone really think the sexual predator president, who used to party with Jeffrey Epstein, was going to release the Epstein files?”

Collins has repeatedly pushed for public access to high-profile case documents. Earlier this year, he tweeted calls to release not only the Epstein files but also records related to the 2017 Las Vegas mass shooting and long-sealed Kennedy assassination materials. His campaign has even fundraised off the House Oversight Committee’s subpoenas tied to the Epstein investigation, calling the issue “bigger than Russiagate.”

A Collins campaign spokesman dismissed the uproar in a statement to the Examiner, calling the flap “a massive nothingburger from never-Trump consultants using DNC talking points.” The spokesman insisted Collins’ words were being twisted, adding: “President Trump was right about everything, kicked Epstein to the curb, and did nothing wrong.”

The Wall Street Journal reported in July that Attorney General Pam Bondi told Trump during a routine briefing that his name appeared in Epstein case files — though the mention did not imply misconduct. Still, Collins’ remarks mark a rare acknowledgment from within Trump’s political base that the former president’s name may surface in the controversy.

Alleged Predator of Nancy Mace Arrested on 1st-Degree Domestic Violence Charges

Eric Bowman, one of four men Congresswoman and gubernatorial candidate Nancy Mace publicly accused earlier this year of being a sexual predator, was arrested today on felony charges of first-degree domestic violence, according to multiple news outlets.

Bowman, 45, a Sullivan’s Island businessman, was arrested Wednesday morning at approximately 6:22 a.m. by Sullivan’s Island police and booked into Charleston County jail. He faces a single count of first-degree domestic violence, a serious felony under South Carolina law. A bond hearing was held shortly after his arrest, and Bowman was denied bond by the court.

The charge stems from a disturbing video recorded in 2016, in which a man, identified by authorities as Bowman, is heard slapping, kicking, choking, dragging, and assaulting a woman inside a dimly lit room. The video was made public recently and circulated widely online. Mace described the footage as “gut-wrenching.” The video was released with the consent of the victim.

In February, Mace delivered a dramatic “scorched earth” speech on the U.S. House floor, naming Bowman and three other men — including her ex-fiancé — and accusing them of crimes ranging from non-consensual recordings to sexual assault. All four men denied the allegations.

Bowman was previously arrested in April on unrelated stalking and harassment charges involving his estranged wife, though a stalking charge was dismissed earlier this month. Mace has also filed a defamation lawsuit against him.

Following today’s arrest, Mace publicly welcomed the development. “Violent criminals belong behind bars. Eric Bowman’s arrest today is an important step toward protecting victims, holding violent criminals accountable and making our community safer,” she said ahead of the bond hearing.

Bowman remains in custody as his case proceeds. The investigation stems from both the resurfaced 2016 video and the broader criminal inquiry involving allegations Mace raised earlier this year.

>